PriceThe Ipad remains very vulnerable at it’s price point. With taxes, a base 16 GB Ipad 2 that has Wifi only is about $538. That’s a lot of money. For consumers, thats a lot of money but even with a steep enterprise discount, that would be a ton of money to spend – if Microsoft had a similar tablet with a base price of $299. Multiply those numbers by 5,000 employees and you start to see who would win that discussion.
SecurityIn a Microsoft world, an Ipad is an Apple device. From an enterprise perspective, that means a foreign object on the network with all sorts of requirements for monitoring and maintenance. One more device you have to worry about upgrading and securing. A potential hassle.
DeploymentSo we have 5,000 Ipads. How are we going to deploy them and make sure they are all up to spec and are able to support employees questions? If your current IT shop is all PC, you may need new deployment resources, new software, consulting firms etc. Not so much with a Windows 8 tablet.
AccountabilityThis is by far the most important. Anyone who knows how enterprise projects are pitched, approved, developed, executed and supported knows that management usually has one major concern throughout the process.
“Who is responsible for this?”This is Microsoft’s ace in the hole. If an organization already has an enterprise level agreement with Microsoft with established SLA’s in place, Microsoft need to throw Tablet support in there. Their pitch needs to be:
“Why would you want to call both Microsoft and Apple on the phone? With Apple saying it’s our fault and our technicians not being able to troubleshoot Apple products, it becomes a royal mess. You need a single point of contact for all your support needs, you’re already paying a lot of money for it, why don’t you take advantage of it?”Game over. That is something any executive has to seriously consider. Who wants to be on the phone with Apple support and have them point the finger at MSFT and vice versa? Anyway, that’s my take. If Microsoft have a decent, affordable and competitive Windows 8 tablet, they’ll be just fine. Microsoft sales staff, pay attention. 🙂 Let me know if you agree…]]>
I totally agree.
After all, IE is the worst browser but has the majority of users…
it has improved quite a bit, though it still sucks -.-
Indeed. It’s painfully obvious.
I’ld even go futher.
Suppose your company is all Apple. Then STILL you need to account for yet another device… Now you have macs running mac OS and you need to add other devices running another OS. Surely their would be better integration of iOS in an all mac world, but it doesn’t change the fact that you have a SECOND OS to keep into account. This inevitably results in the need of more know-how and additional resources or training accross the board (users, maintenance, security, network integration, development, support, …)
Whereas a win8 tablet is just… windows. There literally is NO difference between a win tablet, a win laptop or a win desktop. It’s all just windows…
The exact same business processes and procedures allready in place apply. No need for anything extra. At all.
It’s just another windows machine.
Sounds good but I doubt if it’s economically feasible, even if MS gets into the hardware business and builds its own tablet. If they bought HP they could resurrect the Slate with Win8 AND go after the consumer market with a repriced Touchpad! But I’d be shocked to see that happen.