<![CDATA[Okay, so today's post isn't as much of an analyze of Windows 8 features, instead it is more of me just throwing around an idea and getting community feedback. Don't take it too seriously, I'm not suggesting MS waste tons of money on this if it was too expensive, just curious if something like the idea I propose below could be done cheaply and give MS a good way to “give back” to the community. Without further ado: Okay, so recently I decided I wanted a machine that I could dedicate completely to my two-and-a-half year old for games and other stuff that just keeps her entertained. I know, why does a two-year old need a laptop? For one, because her dad is a stay-at-home parent who works full-time online, and having a PC that she can use next to me keeps her entertained. For another, I don't really like letting her use my machine because it is tied to many work-related documents. So I dusted off my older IBM Thinkpad (Pentium 4 with only 512MB of RAM), deciding this would be a great machine for her. I ordered a new battery for only $20 on eBay (generic one) and that's about it, though I may eventually upgrade the RAM to at least 1GB. Okay, so what about the operating system? Initially I wanted to use Windows XP, but honestly it just feels, and looks, so OUTDATED. Sure, you can customize its look with skins and such, but programs that allow this are resource hogs. A Pentium 4 needs to be minimalistic. Recently becoming impressed by Ubuntu Linux I decided to look down that route instead. I came across an Ubuntu derivative called “Lubuntu” that I quickly decided was right for this machine. Essentially, Lubuntu has all the great driver and app support from Ubuntu but uses a much more simplified desktop shell that looks more like Windows, actually. Unlike Windows XP it looks and feels more modern, and has better support for many of today's web standards (though XP isn't TOO bad here). This got me thinking, is Microsoft missing out on potential market here, even if it isn't a high profit one? In the third world they push localized versions of Windows 7 (and soon Windows 8), but honestly, wouldn't an enterprising company like Microsoft do good to have a re-certification program? Imagine a system where you can deliver your old PC as a recyclable (tax write-off) and MS than takes it off your hands, re-certifies it, and puts on a customized lightweight OS. From there it goes to education markets, low-income homes, and third-world nations. Windows XP would be the basis of this plan, basically just modernizing some of its elements and taking out unnecessary processes to speed it up, perhaps call it “Windows LEGACY EDITION” or something? You have to consider costs here, but if it was donate-based than I doubt it would cost MS much but it would do them wonders when it came to positive publicity if they were pretty much giving these away to educational purposes or selling them VERY cheaply to families that can't afford modern PCs. If you are just emailing, web browsing, and playing basic games- Lubuntu works blazingly quick. I was actually surprised at how well it performs, in fact I could EASILY use it as a productivity machine now. Could Microsoft do the same thing with Windows if they based it on the aging XP platform? Would it be worth the additional needed update support and other resources that would be involved? Is this a silly idea that wouldn't be any use to MS, either from $$$ or charity perspective? Or could it have merit and give MS a way to better compete against lightweight Linux distros like Puppy Linux and Lubuntu? Share your thoughts below.]]>
Would A Lightweight Microsoft Windows Version For Older Hardware Be A Good Idea?
April 17, 2012 Microsoft 8 Comments
you could always use windows 7 tiny 7 it is about 700MB and just over 1GB installed.
Thanks for the suggestion. May have to check it out!
I’m all for it!!! It is definitely good for me since I have one room in the house packed with old PC hardware. On the other hand, it may not be good for Linux distros and other open source alternatives. I am aware of some lean Windows version floating around the internet (e.g. a Win7 mod which was optimized to run games). Thus, releasing a lean Win8 and selling it at a cheaper price may end up as an advantage for MS. Some people running multiple PCs will most likely have some of the PCs running Linux distros or moded Windows. If MS gives them the opportunity to get a lean Win8 for say $10-20 (plus all the support and updates), I don’t see why they will stick with their distros/bottlegs instead of buying cheap Win8. Lean WIN is a WIN-WIN… a win for consumers and a WIN for MS, but not for MS hardware partners and Linux.
Honestly that is probably why it will never exist… MS doesn’t want to hurt it’s partners. Though to be honest, and not to offend Windows die-hards here, the primary reason I use Windows is for games/modern software… if you have older hardware you probably can’t use half the windows games and software anyway… so a lean Linux might be good enough and possibly more stable than a lean-Windows would be.
I may experiment with Tiny 7 and a few others though and see how they fare.
I would love to see MS help out the community and people in need. Any organization can do it actually; doesn’t have to be MS. It is far easier to put a minimal linux OS on a old, donated, PC than redesign a whole new OS (Windows) for that purpose. Linux will do the job more than sufficiently; so, why reinvent the wheel?
Very good point. Like I mentioned above, Lubuntu certainly did wonders for a Pentium 4. From what I hear, Puppy Linux can even make a Pentium 2 and 3 work fairly well. Even possibly a Pentium 1, though it probably won’t be that USEFUL for day-to-day usage.
I wouldnt be too surprised to see a lightweight version, after all, they are actually in the midst of putting out a lightweight version of Windows phone…
I wish 🙂 nice post